142 messages in org.apache.cocoon.devRe: [RT] Is Cocoon Obsolete?
FromSent OnAttachments
Stefano MazzocchiSep 30, 2005 2:56 pm 
Sebastien ArbogastSep 30, 2005 3:11 pm 
Ralph GoersSep 30, 2005 3:16 pm 
Leo SuticSep 30, 2005 3:48 pm 
Berin LoritschSep 30, 2005 4:27 pm 
Tony CollenSep 30, 2005 4:47 pm 
Niclas HedhmanSep 30, 2005 10:20 pm 
Andrew SavoryOct 1, 2005 7:23 am 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 1, 2005 1:51 pm 
Jaka JaksicOct 1, 2005 6:41 pm 
Niclas HedhmanOct 1, 2005 9:42 pm 
Niclas HedhmanOct 1, 2005 10:11 pm 
Joerg HeinickeOct 2, 2005 1:13 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 2, 2005 1:51 am 
Daniel FagerstromOct 2, 2005 4:02 am 
Luca MorandiniOct 2, 2005 4:29 am 
Daniel FagerstromOct 2, 2005 5:53 am 
Luca MorandiniOct 2, 2005 6:43 am 
Andreas PetterOct 2, 2005 7:03 am 
Torsten CurdtOct 2, 2005 7:32 am 
Antonio GallardoOct 2, 2005 12:01 pm 
Bertrand DelacretazOct 2, 2005 12:38 pm 
Antonio GallardoOct 2, 2005 12:48 pm 
Ross GardlerOct 2, 2005 1:11 pm 
Bertrand DelacretazOct 2, 2005 1:13 pm 
Antonio GallardoOct 2, 2005 1:41 pm 
Antonio GallardoOct 2, 2005 2:02 pm 
Pier FumagalliOct 2, 2005 3:51 pm 
Niclas HedhmanOct 2, 2005 10:11 pm 
Reinhard PoetzOct 2, 2005 10:55 pm 
Bertrand DelacretazOct 3, 2005 2:33 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 3:10 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 3:39 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 4:09 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 4:42 am 
Andrew SavoryOct 3, 2005 4:50 am 
Ralph GoersOct 3, 2005 4:52 am 
Thomas LutzOct 3, 2005 5:01 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 5:06 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 5:18 am 
Luca MorandiniOct 3, 2005 5:26 am 
Andrew SavoryOct 3, 2005 5:33 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 6:20 am 
Tony CollenOct 3, 2005 6:28 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 6:35 am 
UpayaviraOct 3, 2005 6:43 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 6:44 am 
Berin LoritschOct 3, 2005 7:14 am 
Luca MorandiniOct 3, 2005 7:18 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 7:29 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 8:02 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 8:08 am 
Steven NoelsOct 3, 2005 8:19 am 
Carsten ZiegelerOct 3, 2005 8:31 am 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 3, 2005 8:36 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 8:41 am 
Daniel FagerstromOct 3, 2005 8:44 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 8:53 am 
Carsten ZiegelerOct 3, 2005 8:57 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 8:59 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 9:00 am 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 3, 2005 9:04 am 
Luca MorandiniOct 3, 2005 9:11 am 
Andrew SavoryOct 3, 2005 9:20 am 
78 later messages
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [RT] Is Cocoon Obsolete?Actions...
From:Sylvain Wallez (sylv@apache.org)
Date:Oct 2, 2005 1:51:25 am
List:org.apache.cocoon.dev

Joerg Heinicke wrote:

On 30.09.2005 23:57, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:

Over the last 6 months, I worked pretty heavily on Mozilla as a platform.

As you might know I (or we at Virbus at that time) have created an application built on Mozilla [1] [2].

but most important, is that pretty much everything that cocoon was born to do, you can now do it in firefox directly.

And we also perceived the fact that Cocoon to a large extent was no longer used in the way it was targeted. AFAIR the only "classical" pipeline was a serializing of business objects to XML and transforming these structures to RDF. The other tasks could have been done by other software too, e.g. delivering static resources. So, yes, I can agree to a certain extent to your thoughts.

I do that for my latest web sites and the more I learn how to driven the client, the less I feel the need for advanced server frameworks. Is it just me? Is client side advancement making cocoon and all its machinery to compensate for advanced web client obsolete and archaic?

No. Cocoon is not and will not become obselete IMO. First you need a server framework, somewhat has still to respond to requests. Now must it be an advanced one? What's advanced? Is Struts advanced? Must it be Cocoon?

At least I prefer it by far. Cocoon is the most flexible framework and is probably the one that best suits to the new requirements. So Cocoon has maybe to move its focus - for the case rich clients really take off. But I can see that frameworks like Struts with a focus on just view and controller might become obsolete.

For Cocoon removing the creation of UIs from the server still leaves enough room as integration platform (serializing business objects, getting data from anywhere) or for fulfilling non-functional requirements, e.g. caching.

+1 (not much time for a lengthy answer).

With Forms+Ajax, it's true that Cocoon is somehow underused: very few pipelines definitions, and most of the work is done in flowscripts and jxtemplates (and of course business logic classes). So we may wonder why using Cocoon at all for this. Well, just cforms + flowscript + continuations makes it so easy! Add some automatic binding to database/object model that seems to be in the air currently, and that will be even easier.

Now as has been said, life is not just about webapps, but also about complex publishing and fetching and storing data here and there. And Cocoon will shine for a long time here.

Also, Mozilla is definitely cool and powerful, but we can't say that Cocoon must be trashed because Mozilla can be used as an application platform: JavaWebStart makes the same promise, and how many widespread apps use it?

Finally, thinking that everybody will use Mozilla is a dream (and a dictator's one -- think monopoly): - on the desktop Microsoft, like it or not, is the dominant player, and there is Safari, Konqueror, etc... - the mobile web is taking off, and these terminals don't have xul nor xslt inside, - millions of people in emerging countries will use low-end PCs with a simple browser [1] [2]

And Cocoon is a great tool to target all these various browsers.

Now it's true that Cocoon became fat over the years, and that it should be put on diet. But this is a difficult thing as so many users rely on the fat...

Sylvain

[1] http://www.techreview.com/articles/05/09/wo/wo_092805bullis.asp [2] http://laptop.media.mit.edu/