142 messages in org.apache.cocoon.devRe: [RT] Is Cocoon Obsolete?
FromSent OnAttachments
Stefano MazzocchiSep 30, 2005 2:56 pm 
Sebastien ArbogastSep 30, 2005 3:11 pm 
Ralph GoersSep 30, 2005 3:16 pm 
Leo SuticSep 30, 2005 3:48 pm 
Berin LoritschSep 30, 2005 4:27 pm 
Tony CollenSep 30, 2005 4:47 pm 
Niclas HedhmanSep 30, 2005 10:20 pm 
Andrew SavoryOct 1, 2005 7:23 am 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 1, 2005 1:51 pm 
Jaka JaksicOct 1, 2005 6:41 pm 
Niclas HedhmanOct 1, 2005 9:42 pm 
Niclas HedhmanOct 1, 2005 10:11 pm 
Joerg HeinickeOct 2, 2005 1:13 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 2, 2005 1:51 am 
Daniel FagerstromOct 2, 2005 4:02 am 
Luca MorandiniOct 2, 2005 4:29 am 
Daniel FagerstromOct 2, 2005 5:53 am 
Luca MorandiniOct 2, 2005 6:43 am 
Andreas PetterOct 2, 2005 7:03 am 
Torsten CurdtOct 2, 2005 7:32 am 
Antonio GallardoOct 2, 2005 12:01 pm 
Bertrand DelacretazOct 2, 2005 12:38 pm 
Antonio GallardoOct 2, 2005 12:48 pm 
Ross GardlerOct 2, 2005 1:11 pm 
Bertrand DelacretazOct 2, 2005 1:13 pm 
Antonio GallardoOct 2, 2005 1:41 pm 
Antonio GallardoOct 2, 2005 2:02 pm 
Pier FumagalliOct 2, 2005 3:51 pm 
Niclas HedhmanOct 2, 2005 10:11 pm 
Reinhard PoetzOct 2, 2005 10:55 pm 
Bertrand DelacretazOct 3, 2005 2:33 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 3:10 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 3:39 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 4:09 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 4:42 am 
Andrew SavoryOct 3, 2005 4:50 am 
Ralph GoersOct 3, 2005 4:52 am 
Thomas LutzOct 3, 2005 5:01 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 5:06 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 5:18 am 
Luca MorandiniOct 3, 2005 5:26 am 
Andrew SavoryOct 3, 2005 5:33 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 6:20 am 
Tony CollenOct 3, 2005 6:28 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 6:35 am 
UpayaviraOct 3, 2005 6:43 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 6:44 am 
Berin LoritschOct 3, 2005 7:14 am 
Luca MorandiniOct 3, 2005 7:18 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 7:29 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 8:02 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 8:08 am 
Steven NoelsOct 3, 2005 8:19 am 
Carsten ZiegelerOct 3, 2005 8:31 am 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 3, 2005 8:36 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 8:41 am 
Daniel FagerstromOct 3, 2005 8:44 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 8:53 am 
84 later messages
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [RT] Is Cocoon Obsolete?Actions...
From:Andrew Savory (and@luminas.co.uk)
Date:Oct 1, 2005 7:23:36 am
List:org.apache.cocoon.dev

Hi,

I think Stefano raises some interesting issues, but there's a flaw in the premise: is everything we do in Cocoon targeted at a browser- based client model? I don't think so. It discounts Cocoon as an integration framework, an XML-based service bus (urgh, buzzword bingo time), and Cocoon as a solution for client platform independence.

That said, I do think there'll be massive challenges in working with the rich client world, when the "transform it all on the server side" model becomes less relevant. Stefano's absolutely right about the challenges these rich clients bring to server-side frameworks. And I surely agree that Cocoon itself has complexity issues, which brings us to Tony's points...

On 1 Oct 2005, at 00:48, Tony Collen wrote:

1. (Like Berin) I am admittedly infatuated with Rails. This may be the infatuation speaking, but the "Rails doesn't scale" smells like FUD to me.

Not so much FUD as much as a practical statement - I'm sure it will scale, but as with every new framework, the Rails folk need to put some work in to make it handle the complex stuff just as well as it currently handles the simple stuff. The benefit of beginning from a simple premise ("write less code", "convention over configuration") is you get to start with no preconceptions on how to do things, and make life easier for the developer. The downside is you then need to meet developer expectations consistently - and keep things simple all the way up the stack. IMHO, Rails is not quite there yet.

3. More functionality is moving to the browser, but the apps will still reside on servers. I can't see that moving away. I always knew server-side XSLT was sort of a stopgap until browsers could do it reliably.

I think this may be true for display-based XSLT processing, but I think it misses out rather a lot of pre-display processing that goes on. I'm also not entirely convinced large companies will be happy about sending out their content and presentation as separate packages. My bet is server-side XSLT is here to stay, for quite some time.

- Simplify Cocoon.

Heheh. Someone should do a talk about this at the GetTogether. Oh, wait .... ;-)

This is exactly the point I'm hoping to get across - helping our users with convention over configuration, less XML sit-ups, providing a clearer "best practice" and a way to hit the ground running right away.

What's the bare minimum we can get away with? Not only functionality, but also actual amount of code? Ugo's work with Spring and Butterfly probably is a good starting point.

I can't help with the internals of Cocoon (it's way over my head), but I hope I can provide a starting point for lowering the learning curve of Cocoon beginners. If I manage to get the code working, I'll drop it into the whiteboard alongside Bertrand's.

Tony, who feels like he dumped a lot of stuff from his brain because of Stefano's RT.

Andrew, who feels like with every passing day more of the ideas of his presentation crop up on the mailing lists before he's had a chance to present them ;-)